Skip to main content

Rick Barnes adapted this offseason; now, he needs his new roster to do the same

Rick Barnes went all-in on shot-creation, but can he new offensive weapons all play together?
Tennessee coach Rick Barnes
Tennessee coach Rick Barnes | Brianna Paciorka/News Sentinel / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

As remarkable as Tennessee’s run of three-straight Elite Eight trips has been, for a head coach who hasn’t been to the Final Four since 2003 and a program that’s never been, the prevailing feeling has to be one of exasperation. Barnes’s offseason activity exemplifies that. 

It’s clear that Barnes is tired of banging his head against the ceiling with a stout defense, toughness, physicality, and rebounding. In every Elite Eight loss, in 2024 against Purdue, 2025 against Houston, and 2026 against Michigan, Tennessee was just a shot creator or two short. 

Even after a massive spending spree and portal overhaul, Tennessee’s 2026-27 roster isn’t perfect, but if the Volunteers come up short, it won’t be for a lack of shot-makers. Rick Barnes adapted his roster construction philosophy; now, he needs to convince his new players to alter their approach to make this team work. 

Can Tennessee’s high-usage rate portal haul play together?

A Rick Barnes-coached team will always find a way to have a solid floor defensively. He’s going to get his team to play hard and rebound; that’s the culture of the program, and I think almost no matter who he brought in, that wouldn’t go away. 

Now, this group specifically may not be top-five on that end of the floor, but with Loyola Chicago transfer Miles Rubin’s rim protection on the back end, Kennesaw State transfer Braedan Lue’s ability to disrupt the game with his length, and the positional size they’ll have, the Vols will be alright. The question, ironically, with so much offensive talent pouring into Knoxville, is how this team will fit on that end of the floor. 

From Dalton Knecht to Chaz Lanier, to Ja’Kobe Gillespie and Nate Ament, Barnes often brings in one true on-ball shot creator to become the focal point of his offense and bail them out of stagnant possessions. Against the best competition, that model tends to have its limitations. So, he’s abandoned it and instead added four ball-dominant creators in the portal, Dai Dai Ames, Terrence Hill Jr., Jalen Haralson, and, most recently, Juke Harris. 

The vision makes sense. Have three or four true creators and initiators on the floor at all times. Players who can grab and go in transition, attack closeouts, run any type of traditional or inverted pick-and-roll, and when it gets late in the shot-clock, have multiple players who can salvage the possession. It only works, however, if all four are willing to sacrifice and have the ball in their hands a little–or in some cases, a lot–less. 

Stat (percentile)

usage rate

assist ratio

% assisted FGM

Juke Harris

28.7% (98th)

8.9% (38th)

48.3% (16th)

Dai Dai Ames

26.8% (91st)

11.4% (29th)

32% (17th)

Terrence Hill Jr.

26.2% (89th)

17.9% (64th)

43.6% (37th)

Jalen Haralson

33.1% (99th)

13.2% (38th)

18.1% (3rd)

Sometimes players with a high usage rate, especially on bad teams like Cal, Notre Dame, and Wake Forest last season, had that high usage rate out of necessity. Then, when dropped into a better situation, they’re willing to surrender a few possessions and see an uptick in efficiency because of it.

There’s an argument that will happen for Ames, Haralson, and Harris, who all missed the tournament last year, and that Hill will be comfortable as a microwave scorer in short bursts off the bench. That’d be my expectation, especially with Ames, Harris, and Hill’s ability to shoot the three off the catch, and the now underrated addition of knockdown three-point shooter Tyler Lundblade, who scored 80 percent of his baskets off an assist last season. 

Still, there is the lingering possibility that they don’t know how to play off the ball or, worse yet, aren’t willing to let others run the show. Not only are all four high-volume scorers, but they did so with a remarkably low percentage of their field goal makes coming via an assist. That could lend itself to a your turn, my turn situation that fails to maximize the offensive talent Barnes has assembled. 

It’s undoubtedly a gamble to radically alter your tenets of roster construction in your 39th year as a Division I head coach, but it’s a gamble worth making because if the talent he assembled does coalesce, Barnes could have one of the best teams in the country on his hands, entering the conversation with Duke, Michigan, and Florida as a national title contender. If it doesn’t, though, it’ll be the most frustrating.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations