Tennessee football: 10 historic coaching hires that resemble Josh Heupel
Record at time of hire: 17-13; Record at Texas: 167-47-5
Previous schools:
- Mississippi State Bulldogs: 1954-1955
- Washington Huskies: 1956
In terms of direct parallels, Frank Beamer is the most similar to Josh Heupel. However, if you add Tennessee football’s goals and aspirations, Darrell Royal is the guy the Vols would most like to emulate with the hire of Heupel.
More from All for Tennessee
- How to Win a GUARANTEED $200 Bonus Betting Just $5 on the Vols vs. Florida!
- Tennessee Football at Florida: Five Keys to a Vols Victory
- Week 3 SEC Power Rankings: Did Tennessee Football’s Win Help At All?
- Week 3 AP Polls: Why Did Tennessee Football Drop in the Polls?
- Tennessee Football: Top Five Performers in 30-13 Win vs. Austin Peay
Royal, like Heupel, was hired after his worst season as a head coach. It was also his only season with the Washington Huskies, as he went 5-5 with them in 1956. That was not an improvement from what John Cherberg did the previous year there, going 5-4-1 in 1955.
Before that, though, Royal spent two years with the Mississippi State Bulldogs, and he went 6-4 both years. Well, he followed Murray Warmath, who went 5-4 and 5-2-3 in two years at MSU. Simply put, Royal’s profile was a guy who had equal or lesser success relative to his predecessors.
That combined with his worst season being his most recent one when the Texas Longhorns hired him is enough for us to draw that comparison. However, then there is a schematic factor. Replacing Ed Price as head coach, Royal introduced the fashionable Wishbone offense.
The Wishbone then was as fashionable as the up-tempo quarterback-driven spread offense that Heupel runs is now. It worked like perfection for Royal, as he won 11 Southwest Conference titles and three national titles in 20 years there.
Obviously, Tennessee football fans will always like to consider themselves the real UT, and they have good reason to. However, Royal’s success at the other UT is a great, albeit ambitious and maybe unrealistic, model for Heupel. That’s why he tops this list.